Page 2 of 2
Re: i5 and i7 Cores
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 3:57 pm
by Scott
48 cores seems excessive. I mean there is only quad-core now and it runs smooth. Maybe 10 cores max but 48 cores? If applications become more power intensive then this makes sense but for now, to reiterate, 48 cores?!
Re: i5 and i7 Cores
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:11 pm
by Ironman21
I could see 12 cores that split up to act like 48 virtual cores, but not 48 real cores
Re: i5 and i7 Cores
Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:24 pm
by Scott
Hyper-threading?
Re: i5 and i7 Cores
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 10:43 am
by Ironman21
yeah, thats what i meant
Re: i5 and i7 Cores
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:57 pm
by sukispartan
holy &%*$#.
Re: i5 and i7 Cores
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:01 pm
by Scott
it's not that complicated
Re: i5 and i7 Cores
Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 8:06 pm
by sukispartan
for a 13 year old it is.
Re: i5 and i7 Cores
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:46 pm
by Arosenivai
sadly most applications though, are not well suited for multi-core processors.