Do you want to see heros in BF3?

Total votes: 9
Yes (4) 44%
Yes but as a new unit type that is less powerful (5) 56%
No No votes
User avatar
Sam
Jedi Council Member
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 481
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:33 pm
Allegiance:: Neutral
Location: UK
User avatar
Jedi Council Member
Jedi Council Member
Heros in BF3, for or against?

Post by Sam »

So I was just reading through a bit of BF1 vs BF2 discussion. Obviously a major difference between the two was the introduction of heros, namely jedi and sith characters.

Some say that it spiced things up a bit mid combat and was balanced as both sides had access to a hero. Put in the right hands it could turn the tide of battle in favour of one team.

Others say it absolutely killed the concept of the origional game, of just being another soldier in a larger fight.

I personally think that the heroes should be taken of the game and replaced with another soldier class, that is unlockable towards the end called Jedi Knight or Sith Warrior , with significantly less power than an actual hero. Maybe even be your own designed/customised character, i.e you choose thier atributes, look, force powers and speed from a point pool or something.

I remember playing polis massa on BF2 as the CIS, unlocking Darth Maul and quite happily get around a 100 or so kills. Not even three experianced human players on the other side could take me down.

Anyway, you know where I stand, what do you think?
Jedi Master
Jedi Master
Posts: 256
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:11 pm
Allegiance:: Jedi
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:
Jedi Master
Jedi Master
Re: Heros in BF3, for or against?

Post by ploplyguy »

I am against playable heroes, but I like the idea of unlocking a melee character halfway through the match. I still think there should be heroes, but they fight alongside you, similar to BF1.

OH andI am not against having hero only matches like Assault as long as the heroes' controls are better.
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3307
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:06 am
Allegiance:: Space Rome
Location: ON, Canada
User avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Re: Heros in BF3, for or against?

Post by Scott »

I am also against heroes. I wouldn't even want a custom class.

I was thinking, why is it in a universe like Star Wars with many weapons, and if Galactic Battlegrounds has proved anything, that there are also lots of unit types, that there are only 5 (?) classes in BF. There could be 10+ for each side easily. I'd love to have a class hierarchy to climb as you play. There could be loads: Gatling gun - place down to use, flamethrower, units that can climb on vehicles and place bombs to explode that also have melee "claws", etc, etc. I say screw heroes, add more unique classes.
Image
Jedi Master
Jedi Master
Posts: 256
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:11 pm
Allegiance:: Jedi
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:
Jedi Master
Jedi Master
More classes would be perfect for bigger battles but I think non playable heroes like BF would be sweet... and you could only kill em by blowing them off ledges or running em over lol
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1584
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:13 pm
Allegiance:: Jedi
Location: Italy
Contact:
User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
I chose yes. BF3 game-play should be kept as it is. But heroes should spawn rather than your character transforming into one.
YouTube - BF3Enthusiast
Twitter - spartacus128
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3307
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:06 am
Allegiance:: Space Rome
Location: ON, Canada
User avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Re: Heros in BF3, for or against?

Post by Scott »

spartan_sixtyfour wrote:BF3 game-play should be kept as it is
I disagree. If it is than we're just going to get BF HD.
spartan_sixtyfour wrote:But heroes should spawn rather than your character transforming into one.
They did spawn :?:
Image
Jedi Council Member
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 570
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 2:33 am
Allegiance:: what.
Location: щ(゚Д゚щ)
User avatar
Jedi Council Member
Jedi Council Member
Re: Heros in BF3, for or against?

Post by Kelevra »

I think more than five or six classes might be a little bit overwhelming. Using the existing classes as a basis, and allowing you to customize your equipment loadout might be a bit better. The Battlefield games have been doing just fine with that.

I didn't have too much of an issue with playable heroes. The issue was that in Battlefront 2 the player was already the strongest thing on the field, so letting them be a hero only made things even more one-sided. In singleplayer, at least.
Image
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3307
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 2:06 am
Allegiance:: Space Rome
Location: ON, Canada
User avatar
Administrator
Administrator
Re: Heros in BF3, for or against?

Post by Scott »

Kelevra wrote:I think more than five or six classes might be a little bit overwhelming. Using the existing classes as a basis, and allowing you to customize your equipment loadout would be a bit better.
I don't share the same overwhelming feeling but a hybrid of the Battlefield system and the numerous possibilities in the Star Wars universe would probably satisfy me as well.

All this talk makes me want a Battlefield: Warhammer 40K. That'd be epic.
Image
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1584
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:13 pm
Allegiance:: Jedi
Location: Italy
Contact:
User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
spartan_sixtyfour wrote:But heroes should spawn rather than your character transforming into one.
They did spawn :?:[/quote]

Not in Renegade and Elite squadron.
YouTube - BF3Enthusiast
Twitter - spartacus128
Jedi Initiate
Jedi Initiate
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:40 am
Allegiance:: Jedi
Location: USA, Some place in TX between somewhere and the middle of nowhere
User avatar
Jedi Initiate
Jedi Initiate
I really liked the Heroes and the extra dynamic they bring so I would say yes, but then again I was only able to play Battlefront Offline. With having a limited time to use them I would think that can’t affect the game so much as to have the lesser skilled players win the game? But then again I guess I can see how in the right hands they could devastate the gameplay.

I think they should be in Battlefront 3 but if you don’t want them then turn them off and if you do then turn them on. If there is plenty of rooms with and without I think everybody should be happy. :)-
Jedi Knight
Jedi Knight
Posts: 162
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 12:10 pm
Allegiance:: Jedi
User avatar
Jedi Knight
Jedi Knight
Re: Heros in BF3, for or against?

Post by iceytoa1 »

No stupid ass kills=time=life thing, just life/time lose all the life before time then unlucky but lose all the time and still have life then awesome.
Jedi Master
Jedi Master
Posts: 256
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:11 pm
Allegiance:: Jedi
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:
Jedi Master
Jedi Master
Re: Heros in BF3, for or against?

Post by ploplyguy »

iceytoa1 wrote:No stupid ass kills=time=life thing, just life/time lose all the life before time then unlucky but lose all the time and still have life then awesome.
Yea I think time is just stupid... just give em health
Post Reply