Battlefront3.net

Post by **Slicer4427** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:18 pm

As I've seen some of you wish that spark unlimited is not making battlefront 3. Some hope the scattered Pandemic developers may create it. I'm not saying any company is yet but Who do you want to make Battlefront 3.

Post by **Scott** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:26 pm

Crytek

Post by **Legion 2.5** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:33 pm

What Scott said. Crytek.

Post by **Joelfigbars** » Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:38 pm

I agree with them, Crytek would be cool. Especially with the cry engine.

Post by **Kelevra** » Wed Feb 02, 2011 3:53 pm

A collaboration of Infinity Ward, Crytek, DICE, Epic, Treyarch, Valve, and Bungie.

Utterly impossible, but guaranteed to kick ass.

Post by **Scott** » Wed Feb 02, 2011 6:49 pm

Then Treyarch would give the PS3 and PC the shaft.

Post by **Kelevra** » Wed Feb 02, 2011 7:02 pm

Aye, but that's what Valve is there for. To counter-shaft the 360.

Post by **spartan64** » Wed Feb 02, 2011 7:41 pm

100% Crytek

Post by **Scott** » Wed Feb 02, 2011 9:24 pm

Kelevra wrote:Aye, but that's what Valve is there for. To counter-shaft the 360.

Scratch Treyarch and Valve. They are useless in the shooter world as far as I care. Now we have IW, Crytek, DICE, Epic, and Bungie. Bungie could be scrapped too considering they are too fast paced.

So, IW for their perfectionist attitude (maybe we should replace IW with Respawn...), Crytek for their engine, DICE for their gameplay, and Epic for their third person experience. That's a list

Post by **Kelevra** » Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:10 pm

They are useless in the shooter world as far as I care.

I dunno, Team Fortress, Counter-strike, and Left 4 Dead are all popular as hell among shooters. That's not counting singleplayer titles like Half-Life.

Post by **Scott** » Wed Feb 02, 2011 10:23 pm

Kelevra wrote:I dunno, Team Fortress, Counter-strike, and Left 4 Dead are all popular as hell among shooters. That's not counting singleplayer titles like Half-Life.

Other than TF's class based system the experience those games would bring isn't very helpful for BF. They are also WAY to fast paced comparing to BF.

Post by **Kelevra** » Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:42 pm

I dunno, as far as I could tell each map in Battlefront kinda set its own pacing. Mustafar/Tantive battles tended to be a lot more intense than Hoth/Geonosis, etc.

Also movie-wise, the prequel battles were also much faster than the original trilogy ones.

Post by **Scott** » Thu Feb 03, 2011 3:58 pm

Kelevra wrote:I dunno, as far as I could tell each map in Battlefront kinda set its own pacing. Mustafar/Tantive battles tended to be a lot more intense than Hoth/Geonosis, etc.

Battlefront does not move nearly as fast as L4D or Team Fortress though. Plus they'd probably bring Stream authentication which would just ruin the whole thing.

Who do you want to develope Battlefront 3.