Battlefront3.net

Post by **Scott** » Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:52 pm

The use of the Crytek engine would be really awesome but probably not practical. Crysis has very few similar elements to BF so it may make it harder for the developers to make it. One of the coolest features of the engine is that once you make a change anywhere it converts it to run on PC, 360, and PS3 all at once. If it was realtime they would hold the key to the best and most amazing console and PC development in the world.

Post by **MillerTime30** » Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:42 am

Arosenivai wrote:In all honesty though, just depends how the developer's contracts work. A publisher isn't a developer's publisher for life. Some, if not most company's sign with publishers for only one game, and because it did well the publisher's are more likely to scoop them back up. Few developer's have publisher's acting like their parent company. Personally, I would like to see Free Radical Design, or maybe even Pandemic pick up the title, but knowing either company, they aren't likely to put in enough development time for the actual multiplayer capacity. So in truth I'm not sure if I'd like them to handle the project, but all the same I'll be happy if it just comes out.

Well Pandemic can't because they were shut down by EA months ago.

Post by **MillerTime30** » Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:45 am

Slayer1 wrote:I think EA and Lucasarts should design bf3 but with Crysis graphics.(but it will never happen.)

Well that would never happen because.

1. EA and LucasArts are publishers, not designers.
2. EA can kiss my ass, I hate them so much.

Post by **Slayer** » Sat Jun 26, 2010 12:02 pm

Pandemic(when still making) was worse than ea

Post by **Arrowstorm** » Sat Jun 26, 2010 1:15 pm

Ea sucks with their servers, I've been waiting for my Xbox 360 medal of Honor beta for 2 freakin' weeks...Plus all launch days by them have crashy servers....Bah!

Post by **Arosenivai** » Sat Jun 26, 2010 3:10 pm

Pandemic wasn't that bad when it was independent.
EA manages to screw up everything though. BTW not to argumentative but, EA has it's own development branches. It isn't just a publisher.

Post by **Slayer** » Sat Jun 26, 2010 6:23 pm

Yea, all the battlefield's multiplayers suck because of ea

Post by **Lordstig** » Sat Jun 26, 2010 8:39 pm

i bet if all of us on here got a big say in the development of the game, it would be the best game known to man!

Post by **MillerTime30** » Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:47 pm

Lordstig wrote:i bet if all of us on here got a big say in the development of the game, it would be the best game known to man!

Well that wouldn't work because the debates would never end. There is always something that someone wouldn't like.

Post by **Scott** » Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:52 pm

And the development time and costs for some ideas would be ridiculous.

Post by **Arosenivai** » Sun Jun 27, 2010 10:18 pm

Well not all of them, but a good amount of them.

Post by **Legion 2.5** » Tue Jun 29, 2010 9:01 pm

Crytek should for me. Or one of the popular developers out there that makes great games.

Post by **Arosenivai** » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:41 pm

Legion 2.5 wrote: Or one of the popular developers out there that makes great games.

Those exist?!

Post by **Legion 2.5** » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:44 pm

Bungie.

Post by **Arosenivai** » Tue Jun 29, 2010 10:49 pm

I've got mixed opinions about them, but I see where you're coming from