Battlefront3.net

Post by **BobaFett** » Fri Jun 01, 2012 2:53 pm

I was just thinking with the recent announcement of Star Wars 1313 who is to say that this game is NOT battlefront 3. Heck we all know that there was a battlefront online in the works and then it got scrapped. What if it got scrapped because it was more feasible to include it as an online multiuplayer mode for another star wars game. Just because 1313 is a "cinematic 3rd person action adventure" doesnt mean it is single player only. We could have battlefront 3 be included as a multiplayer mode for the game. or atleast a spirtual BF3

This just came to mind because I have been replaying the old BF games on pc and it hit me that playing this games solo doesnt have that much of a lasting appeal or even a story. Unless they add a dedicated campaign such as how COD, Halo, Killzone etc battlefront 3 cannot survive in todays market. yeah those games may not have ground breaking stories but when looking at their add campaigns the story usually takes center stage with multiplay details trickling in afterwards.

and with every game nowadays having some sort of mulitplayer I can almost guarentee this will be no different and lucas arts is more than likely to take some aspects out of the battlefront series t draw in a bigger crowd.

Post by **Kelevra** » Fri Jun 01, 2012 2:58 pm

This just came to mind because I have been replaying the old BF games on pc and it hit me that playing this games solo doesnt have that much of a lasting appeal or even a story.

Battlefront had multiplayer? I think I've played a total of 1 online match in all the years I've owned Battlefront.

They could very well tack on some Battlefront-like multiplayer mode, but it wouldn't be the same as having an entire Battlefront game.

Post by **Scott** » Fri Jun 01, 2012 3:16 pm

"...agile cover-based combat, epic platforming, and seamless playable cinematic game play..."

If it wasn't for this and other details and we just had the 3rd person action adventure line then yes, it could be. It"s not though

Post by **Kelevra** » Fri Jun 01, 2012 3:24 pm

agile cover-based

That seems like an oxymoron...

Post by **Scott** » Fri Jun 01, 2012 3:33 pm

Kelevra wrote:
agile cover-based
That seems like an oxymoron...

I guess it's going to be like Vanguish.

Post by **Kelevra** » Fri Jun 01, 2012 3:55 pm

"playable cinematic gameplay"

Post by **Scott** » Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:03 pm

Kelevra wrote:
"playable cinematic gameplay"

Oh God. The horrendous memories. The one aspect that was supposed to be so incredibly cool, was appalling.

Post by **Kelevra** » Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:25 pm

Yep.

Maybe I'm being unfair though and LucasArts is just letting idiots run their PR department. I'll wait til Monday's reveal on it before I start going nuts about things.

Post by **Weeboo521** » Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:15 am

As long as 1313 has first person mode and multiplayer, I'll buy it.

Post by **Kelevra** » Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:46 am

As long as 1313 has first person mode

third-person action adventure

The Spike debut made it pretty clear that they're sticking with third person perspective.

Post by **Weeboo521** » Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:09 pm

Kelevra wrote:
As long as 1313 has first person mode

third-person action adventure
The Spike debut made it pretty clear that they're sticking with third person perspective.

Damn. I didn't watch the Spike announcement so I wouldn't know.

Post by **Legion 2.5** » Sat Jun 02, 2012 12:46 pm

I think this should have multiplayer as well. We've haven't had a descent star wars multiplayer game since BF2.

Post by **Borman** » Sat Jun 02, 2012 11:45 pm

It won't be your Battlefront.