Well, that's not counting the graphics, and the new maps.Scott wrote:You must be listening to crazy people then. The only really big improvement in SWBFII is the Galactic Conquest revision and new gameplay modes. SWBFI is a tighter package overall.AGoodBlaster wrote:Well, i haven't played SWBFI, so I cant really say things from experience, but from what i've heard about it, SWBFII is better.
The only real graphical improvement was some more detailed textures such a clone armour. The new maps didn't improve from any of the great old maps.
I don't dislike SWBFII, but it's no SWBFI.
I don't dislike SWBFII, but it's no SWBFI.

Posts: 348
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:48 pm
Allegiance:: Sith
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
i like both but the one thing i don't like in BF1 is no sprinting which means i can die easier if i cant run to cover and it's annoying to roll to cover
Xbox 360: R3C0N NAT10N
Gamerscore: 13 000
Swtor server: Ajunta Pall
Gamerscore: 13 000
Swtor server: Ajunta Pall
Hmm. I like rolling to cover, out of cover, and straight at enemies while holding the crouch key. It's really helpful if you have a sniper rifle.Then it's like all they see is you rolling then they're dead, and even if they shoot where you would have stood up, they missed.DarthRevan19 wrote:i like both but the one thing i don't like in BF1 is no sprinting which means i can die easier if i cant run to cover and it's annoying to roll to cover
Posts: 348
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:48 pm
Allegiance:: Sith
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
i enjoy sprinting though
Xbox 360: R3C0N NAT10N
Gamerscore: 13 000
Swtor server: Ajunta Pall
Gamerscore: 13 000
Swtor server: Ajunta Pall