Battlefront3.net

Post by **Slicer4427** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:08 am

This has been discussed previously but finding older articles is a challenge. I feel battlefront could play anywhere from 12-24 players each team. There are huge advantages to having 24 players to a team but I can see it becoming too kaotic and 12 becoming a where is everyone? I feel the game would fit 18 players comfortably each team. I want to know what you guys think too though.

Post by **Scott** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:26 am

It vastly depends on the size of maps. I think 32 vs 32 could work if the maps are sizeable with certain maps being held back to 16 vs 16 and maybe even massive scale land and space maps with 64 vs 64. I think 32 vs 32 is a good cap though.

Post by **Terrabyte20xx** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:48 am

I'm with Scott on this one. 32 vs 32 would probably be the best, especially if there is Land to Space.

Post by **RogueStarkiller** » Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:05 pm

It absolutely depends on the size of the maps as well as what system you're using. Consoles probably can't do better than 12v12 especially with AI. Sometimes I wish Battlefront was more like Dynasty Warriors. For those of you that have never played Dynasty Warriors I highly suggest getting an old copy for like 5 bucks at GameStop. It's basically hack and slash through an entire battlefield of Chinese warriors except that ALL the AI are on the field at the same time. If it says there are 300 guys left to kill, you might round a corner into a castle and 300 guys will be there, not just on the team counter.

Post by **Wannahelp1** » Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:41 am

I like Dynasty Warriors already...nd, how many reinforcements should there be? A thousand, two thousand, 10,000 if you want to lock yourself in a room with your friends all weekend? Some maps should be extremely large, so you can have 64 vs.64 people were saying. If that happened, the reinforcements would go down very quickly...A