Battlefront3.net

I want to know what you guys think.

Who can be a possible publisher of Spark Unlimited's Unannounced Project?

You can only choose the publishers listed in the E3 2011 Exhibitor list: http://www.e3expo.com/show-info/641/exhibitor-list/

Since one of the designers mentioned that their publisher will announce their game at E3 2011, the publisher will be attending the expo. It must be a major publishing partner (popular).

Please do a little bit of research before you make up your answer.

If the game is Battlefront 3 then it will be published by ActiVision or LucasArts.

iceytoa1 wrote:If the game is Battlefront 3 then it will be published by ActiVision or LucasArts.

ActiVision can't publish BF3 if Spark are Developing it. Lucasarts needs to be involved.

The question doesn't say 'if the game is battlefront 3' because then there would only be one possible publisher, Lucasarts. We don't know what the unannounced game is but if we find out who the publisher is, we will have an idea on what the game may really be.

But we don't know. Btw why couldn't it be ActiVision all my Star Wars games are ActiVision.

iceytoa1 wrote:But we don't know. Btw why couldn't it be ActiVision all my Star Wars games are ActiVision.

Some really old games are Activision and including republic commando and TFU (Japanese version). Since the publisher of the Battlefront series was always LucasArts, why would ActiVision be BF3's Publisher?
Then again, the question asks who is Spark Unlimited's publisher of the unannounced project?

force unleashed 2 is published by ActiVision, Lucasarts aren't a publisher!

Given how Activision likes to rake in cash, I bet they'd love to get their hands on one of the must successful Star Wars titles ever.

Although Whether that'd be a good or a bad thing is anyone's guess.

iceytoa1 wrote:force unleashed 2 is published by ActiVision, Lucasarts aren't a publisher!

No, Lucas Arts publishes its Star Wars games but Activision distributes them.

But in the upcoming 'The Old Republic', EA will publish instead (since LA obviously don't have enough finances to do so).

Also, I think Lucas Arts would find it good business sense to release Battlefront 3 in the months leading to Battlefield 3's release. Consumers might get tricked into thinking Battlefront 3 is actually Battlefield 3 (or either draw mass attention), and therefore get tricked into making a purchase. Sure, this sounds beguiling and disgraceful, but it would at least give LA reason to release the game this year.

They shouldn't have to trick people, that's wrong as hell.

And I'm sure the game would have a nice STAR WARS logo on it, along with pictures of clones and whatnot on the cover, so you'd probably have to be severely stupid to not know the difference.

I personally think that if you have to resort to underhanded tactics to get your product out, it must not be a very good product. That's (hopefully) not what Battlefront 3 will be.

Kelevra wrote: And I'm sure the game would have a nice STAR WARS logo on it, along with pictures of clones and whatnot on the cover, so you'd probably have to be severely stupid to not know the difference.
.

LOL!

Kelevra wrote:They shouldn't have to trick people, that's wrong as hell.

And I'm sure the game would have a nice STAR WARS logo on it, along with pictures of clones and whatnot on the cover, so you'd probably have to be severely stupid to not know the difference.

I personally think that if you have to resort to underhanded tactics to get your product out, it must not be a very good product. That's (hopefully) not what Battlefront 3 will be.

Even though I'm not encouraging LA to use such a marketing strategy, its something that they would be prone to take advantage of. Because in an era where an increasing amount of games sold are military/ alpha man FPS shooters, LA will struggle to find the entire audience B3 deserves. So what I'm saying is that LA might resort to a marketing campaign where they coy Battlefield gamers into thinking Battlefront 3 is that ultimate sci-fi shooter with Battlefront/ COD-esque imagery perhaps. I imagine the word 'Battlefront' would be emphasized the most to instantly lure the eyes (due to similarities with the Battlefield brand and to attract us B3 hopefuls.)

I kinda think Lucasarts already HAS the audience that Batttlefront 3 deserves - Star Wars fans. Battlefront I was one of LA's most popular and successful games, even while standing against other popular games at the time: Metal Gear Solid 3, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, Half-Life 2, Halo 2, etc. Battlefront II was even more successful.

The fact that it's called STAR WARS guarantees tons of sales regardless of the quality (look at the entire prequel trilogy). Except Battlefront is actually really GOOD. People know that, and have been waiting for a new installment for as long as we have. So, While Lucasarts will definitely compete with other games, they shouldn't have to step on the toes of other companies, or mislead customers to get their product out. They've never done such a thing before.

Now, using shiny marketing tactics to attract the large Call of Duty, Halo, Battlefield, etc-playing masses, that's fine. But by no means should they pretend to be a different product altogether.

Maybe that's what you meant the whole time, and I'm wrong. But my first interpretation of what you said was walking into a store and seeing the black/white/orange-style cover image soldier of Battlefield 3 replaced with a stormtrooper, and BATTLEFRONT 3 written in the Battlefield font. That'd not only be incredibly lame, but flat out deception. (But you'd still have to be pretty dim upstairs to not immediately see the difference between a modern soldier's equipment, and a stormtrooper.)

Kelevra wrote:I kinda think Lucasarts already HAS the audience that Batttlefront 3 deserves - Star Wars fans. Battlefront I was one of LA's most popular and successful games, even while standing against other popular games at the time: Metal Gear Solid 3, Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas, Half-Life 2, Halo 2, etc. Battlefront II was even more successful.

The fact that it's called STAR WARS guarantees tons of sales regardless of the quality (look at the entire prequel trilogy). Except Battlefront is actually really GOOD. People know that, and have been waiting for a new installment for as long as we have. So, While Lucasarts will definitely compete with other games, they shouldn't have to step on the toes of other companies, or mislead customers to get their product out. They've never done such a thing before.

Now, using shiny marketing tactics to attract the large Call of Duty, Halo, Battlefield, etc-playing masses, that's fine. But by no means should they pretend to be a different product altogether.

Maybe that's what you meant the whole time, and I'm wrong. But my first interpretation of what you said was walking into a store and seeing the black/white/orange-style cover image soldier of Battlefield 3 replaced with a stormtrooper, and BATTLEFRONT 3 written in the Battlefield font. That'd not only be incredibly lame, but flat out deception. (But you'd still have to be pretty dim upstairs to not immediately see the difference between a modern soldier's equipment, and a stormtrooper.)

So who do you think the publisher is?

I'm guessing it would be between Activision and Lucasarts, but I hope mainly for LA.

Given what Activision has done with Call of Duty, Guitar Hero, etc; I wouldn't want Battlefront to follow the same path. I'd rather wait a long time for one really awesome game, than get an average one every year.

Kelevra wrote:I'm guessing it would be between Activision and Lucasarts, but I hope mainly for LA.

Given what Activision has done with Call of Duty, Guitar Hero, etc; I wouldn't want Battlefront to follow the same path. I'd rather wait a long time for one really awesome game, than get an average one every year.

I read some articles and it seems that ActiVision is working with Bungie on a COD MMO? Or something at least. So I wouldn't think ActiVision will be publishing the unannounced project or working with spark. That leads to one possible answer - LucasArts is the publisher. According to what you wrote. There has to be something other than LA or Activision. Ubisoft? Cryteck?...

EA are announcing battlefield so no good...

L.A must be announcing something new this E3 since The old Republic was already mentioned in two e3 expos.