Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:46 pm
It's working well for Halo Reach's loadouts.
Page 7 of 10
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 5:28 pm
but Halo is a different game entirely.
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:01 pm
Yeah but there are different load outs for starting weapons and abilities. That would be cool for BF.
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 6:04 pm
Legion 2.5 wrote:Yeah but there are different load outs for starting weapons and abilities. That would be cool for BF.
Arosenivai wrote:but Halo is a different game entirely.
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:42 pm
not even needing to talk anymore?Scott wrote:Legion 2.5 wrote:Yeah but there are different load outs for starting weapons and abilities. That would be cool for BF.Arosenivai wrote:but Halo is a different game entirely.
But seriously, the problems with adding in abilities and starting weapons: first off sounds a lot like Halo trying to act like COD, and we should all know how COD, especially MW2, was incredibly unbalanced.
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:45 pm
Halo's been around before call of duty.
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:49 pm
actually no.Legion 2.5 wrote:Halo's been around before call of duty.
Besides that: the adding of abilities and start weapons is Halo acting like COD.
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:54 pm
Halo is more popular though.
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:05 pm
Hate to tell you this: but as of right now, that's not actually true.Legion 2.5 wrote:Halo is more popular though.
Truth is, I don't care to much for either series. Their good games, but not great games. And I'd prefer BF3 not be flooded with gameplay elements from other games like overpowered melee attacks, and the unrealistic ability to shoot while jumping. The fact is: Halo is different than COD and it makes me sad to see Halo start trying to act like COD. Just as I was sad to see games like Resistance, Haze, etc. that are rip-offs of the Halo series.
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:02 pm
No it wouldn't. 32 v 32 sounds more ideal for Battlefront if they can get ground-to-space tech working. There's a reason why top selling games like Halo and Modern Warfare 2 cap it at around 16 players total. Any more and you would become insignificant to the game outcome.Legion 2.5 wrote:That would be cool if they added 100 vs 100.
I just hope they fix the whole gametype customization in Battlefront (like actually SAVING them).Legion 2.5 wrote:I want maps the size of forge world and be able to actually choose what spawn points and vehicles in there you want.
Did you see that new Bungie video for Forge in Halo: Reach. Man, it looks like it takes a couple minutes to fly from one end of the map to the other just to drop off vehicles. With ground-to-space tech I think SWBF3 could make this even more fun if you could transport an AT-TE onto the ground battle in less than a minute.
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:47 pm
Arosenivai wrote:not even needing to talk anymore?
That is the statement of someone who has yet to play Resistance.Arosenivai wrote:Just as I was sad to see games like Resistance...that are rip-offs of the Halo series.
All this talk of Forge World is disturbing...BFIII does not need customization, nor does Halo, and hope gameplay is the focus.makethree wrote:Did you see that new Bungie video for Forge in Halo: Reach. Man, it looks like it takes a couple minutes to fly from one end of the map to the other just to drop off vehicles. With ground-to-space tech I think SWBF3 could make this even more fun if you could transport an AT-TE onto the ground battle in less than a minute.
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:52 pm
Actually I have played resistance, and it's successor. It, happily, didn't play like Halo, but it was blatant to me what the game itself was trying to do. (in my opinion) I enjoyed resistance more than Halo.Scott wrote:That is the statement of someone who has yet to play Resistance.Arosenivai wrote:Just as I was sad to see games like Resistance...that are rip-offs of the Halo series.
That's what I'd like as well. On the note of transporting an AT-TE. One word, or should I say acronym: LAAT/c.Scott wrote:All this talk of Forge World is disturbing...BFIII does not need customization, nor does Halo, and hope gameplay is the focus.makethree wrote:Did you see that new Bungie video for Forge in Halo: Reach. Man, it looks like it takes a couple minutes to fly from one end of the map to the other just to drop off vehicles. With ground-to-space tech I think SWBF3 could make this even more fun if you could transport an AT-TE onto the ground battle in less than a minute.
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:59 am
Resistance is during WWII and Halo is in the future. Resistance features an infection and Halo is in the future. Resistance is interesting, and Halo...is in the future.Arosenivai wrote:Actually I have played resistance, and it's successor. It, happily, didn't play like Halo, but it was blatant to me what the game itself was trying to do. (in my opinion) I enjoyed resistance more than Halo.Scott wrote:That is the statement of someone who has yet to play Resistance.Arosenivai wrote:Just as I was sad to see games like Resistance...that are rip-offs of the Halo series.
Code: Select all
if (Halo == Generic && Resistance != Generic)
cout << "Scott is Right\n";
Output:
Scott is Right
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:05 pm
Can we talk about which game is better in another topic.
Re: Type of Campaign
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:12 pm
Meh, too many topics. If it gets more heated maybe...Legion 2.5 wrote:Can we talk about which game is better in another topic.