Battlefront3.net

Post by **DarthRevan19** » Fri May 04, 2012 12:31 pm

Scott wrote:
DarthRevan19 wrote:People didnt understand it because: 1. they ask why Jar Jar is in it? Jar Jar is in it because he serves a the comedic character just like 3P0 did in the original triogoly. 2. People ask why is Anakin a little young boy? He's a little young boy when he is discovered as the chosen one, not as a late teens. and stuff like that. Also Kelvera it sounds like your supporting the PC
People wondered why JarJar was in the movie because he was nothing more than a plot device to interest kids. C3PO's humour was small and short. Star Wars isn't a comedy and it obviously never was going to be if JarJar was the best they could come up with.

I don't believe anyone asked why Anakin was a young buy. It made sense for the plot. The actor wasn't very good though.

People wanted anakin to be a jedi already and Jar Jar in there because 3PO is just getting build

Post by **Scott** » Fri May 04, 2012 12:35 pm

DarthRevan19 wrote:
Scott wrote:
DarthRevan19 wrote:People didnt understand it because: 1. they ask why Jar Jar is in it? Jar Jar is in it because he serves a the comedic character just like 3P0 did in the original triogoly. 2. People ask why is Anakin a little young boy? He's a little young boy when he is discovered as the chosen one, not as a late teens. and stuff like that. Also Kelvera it sounds like your supporting the PC
People wondered why JarJar was in the movie because he was nothing more than a plot device to interest kids. C3PO's humour was small and short. Star Wars isn't a comedy and it obviously never was going to be if JarJar was the best they could come up with.

I don't believe anyone asked why Anakin was a young buy. It made sense for the plot. The actor wasn't very good though.
People wanted anakin to be a jedi already and Jar Jar in there because 3PO is just getting build

I'd like you to find proof of someone actually complaining about that, because of all the articles, reviews, comments and videos I've watched on the prequels, that never came up.

Post by **DarthRevan19** » Fri May 04, 2012 12:40 pm

People wondered why JarJar was in the movie because he was nothing more than a plot device to interest kids. C3PO's humour was small and short. Star Wars isn't a comedy and it obviously never was going to be if JarJar was the best they could come up with.

I don't believe anyone asked why Anakin was a young buy. It made sense for the plot. The actor wasn't very good though.[/quote]

People wanted anakin to be a jedi already and Jar Jar in there because 3PO is just getting build[/quote]

I'd like you to find proof of someone actually complaining about that, because of all the articles, reviews, comments and videos I've watched on the prequels, that never came up.[/quote]

i cant find proof on the internet but people i know in my city who like star wars complain about it. Ex. The star wars costume store (501st Canadian Garrison) one of the workers there, we talked about the movies and he started to complain why anakin should have been a jedi straight in the movie

Post by **Darth Nefarius** » Fri May 04, 2012 1:42 pm

What does Episode 1 have to do with LucasArts announcing an MMO at E3?..

Post by **Kelevra** » Fri May 04, 2012 3:19 pm

Also Kelvera it sounds like your supporting the PC

Of course I support the PC. Why wouldn't I? I support it just as much as I support the PS3, 360, Wii, PSVita, and 3DS. They're all here for pretty much the same thing. But, a good gaming PC is, in terms of hardware and adaptability, better than any console.

But, going back to the original discussion about TOR on consoles, I'm sure it's technically possible. As far as stacking XBox Live fees with TOR's subscription fee... There are already plenty of people crazy enough to pay for stuff like Call of Duty Elite.

Post by **DarthRevan19** » Fri May 04, 2012 3:31 pm

Kelevra wrote:
Also Kelvera it sounds like your supporting the PC
Of course I support the PC. Why wouldn't I? I support it just as much as I support the PS3, 360, Wii, PSVita, and 3DS. They're all here for pretty much the same thing. But, a good gaming PC is, in terms of hardware and adaptability, better than any console.

But, going back to the original discussion about TOR on consoles, I'm sure it's technically possible. As far as stacking XBox Live fees with TOR's subscription fee... There are already plenty of people crazy enough to pay for stuff like Call of Duty Elite.

i just dont see it happening on the console

Post by **RattleandHum1988** » Mon May 07, 2012 12:35 pm

http://www.joystiq.com/2012/05/07/lucas ... trademark/

Post by **spartan64** » Mon May 07, 2012 12:46 pm

RattleandHum1988 wrote:http://www.joystiq.com/2012/05/07/lucasfilm-applies-for-star-wars-1313-trademark/

If LucasArt's game isn't SWBF3 then I will "shove a wookie up their star destroyer".

Post by **Terrabyte20xx** » Mon May 07, 2012 4:13 pm

spartan64 wrote:
RattleandHum1988 wrote:http://www.joystiq.com/2012/05/07/lucasfilm-applies-for-star-wars-1313-trademark/
If LucasArt's game isn't SWBF3 then I will "shove a wookie up their star destroyer".

I've given up on asking if every game is BF3. I just want them to make it darn it!

Post by **Semiroundboss** » Tue May 08, 2012 12:30 pm

spartan64 wrote:
RattleandHum1988 wrote:http://www.joystiq.com/2012/05/07/lucasfilm-applies-for-star-wars-1313-trademark/
If LucasArt's game isn't SWBF3 then I will "shove a wookie up their star destroyer".

Oww, my hangar.