Page 4 of 6
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:44 am
by Kelevra
The Sarlacc was fine, it should have just been in a more open area.
The interior of Jabba's barge/Palace should be part of that map as well.
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:47 am
by Legion 2.5
I agree with combining the two maps.
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:36 pm
by Arosenivai
Legion 2.5 wrote:I agree with combining the two maps.
Actually that was an idea that my friends have been shooting around. I don't know if it's necessary to make the area around the sarlacc rather open, because that would make aircraft have a ridiculous advantage over the battlefield.
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:41 pm
by Kelevra
Not really. Aircraft have always been pretty useless in ground battles unless they have a specific role to perform, like the snowspeeders.
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:45 pm
by Arosenivai
Kelevra wrote:Not really. Aircraft have always been pretty useless in ground battles unless they have a specific role to perform, like the snowspeeders.
BF1: Naboo plains. 62 kills no deaths, PvP, end of argument.
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:54 pm
by Sam
I would definatly like to see the impact of bombers/fighter-bombers on the ground battlefield, will definatly make air superiority seem absolutly critical to a successful outcome.
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:55 pm
by Slayer
Here's a cool one I thought up... the death star that you can go into space with ships!

Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:13 pm
by Arosenivai
Obi-Wan wrote:Here's a cool one I thought up... the death star that you can go into space with ships!

Please expand.
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:16 pm
by Legion 2.5
He probably means that if you are on a map say Endor and you can go into the death star on say an x-wing and try to sabotage it, take command posts, or my favorite, BLOW it up.
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:31 pm
by Arosenivai
Don't we already have a topic for that?
Something that needs to be done. to cruisers: Lasers need to be on the bottom as well.
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:32 pm
by Legion 2.5
I want a expaned universe yavin iv with the jedi praxemum and during the vuuuzhan vong invasion.
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:35 pm
by Scott
Arosenivai wrote:Something that needs to be done
That's a multithread topic considering the amount that has to be done.
Why not just land on top of the frigate, then enter through the bottom of the fighter? If someone else can land they can blow your fighter up. That would be the most "realistic" solution in my opinion.
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:38 pm
by Legion 2.5
Landing a fighter on a frigate. Do you mean in it or on top of it?
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:41 pm
by Scott
Legion 2.5 wrote:Landing a fighter on a frigate. Do you mean in it or on top of it?
On it. Sort of like boarding it.
Re: Maps?
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 8:42 pm
by Arosenivai
Legion 2.5 wrote:I want a expaned universe yavin iv with the jedi praxemum and during the vuuuzhan vong invasion.
I think it is unlikely of them to include EU, because it applies to a smaller group of Star Wars fans. The time spent on EU, would be lost on the core factions from the movies. Making more factions would dilute gameplay in my opinion.
Scott wrote:Arosenivai wrote:Something that needs to be done
That's a multithread topic considering the amount that has to be done.
Why not just land on top of the frigate, then enter through the bottom of the fighter? If someone else can land they can blow your fighter up. That would be the most "realistic" solution in my opinion.
I just meant that cruisers needed lasers on there underside. It's hard enough as a fast fighter to take out a bomber topside, but when they swoop underneath to let their pilot abilities heal. It's just annying that people can bomb the underside of cruisers without risk.