Battlefront3.net

i am a huge star wars fan and i know every detail and the clone wars is just telling what happened between episode 2 and 3. and its better then the 2003 version

for the y wing it was produced in the clone wars

DarthRevan19 wrote:i am a huge star wars fan and i know every detail and the clone wars is just telling what happened between episode 2 and 3. and its better then the 2003 version

Well, so am I, and SWTCW is very innaccurate. And darth maul is dead, he was sliced in two and fell 27034570384703874068705876845706374506830495037405734598 miles, along with his lightsaber.

he survived by his hatred and need for vengance.

I don't have that many problems with the Clone Wars (at least, no more problems than I have with anything else Star Wars related), but 'he survived by being angry' is a really, really, really stupid reason for Maul to somehow still be alive.

DarthRevan19 wrote:he survived by his hatred and need for vengance.

His hatred was gone, as he was dead.

ok w dealing with star wars and the force here anything is possible

DarthRevan19 wrote:ok w dealing with star wars and the force here anything is possible

Then why don't we say Sideous survived his fall, and Star wars is incomplete? Not everything is possible, especially when the said person is dead.

Then why don't we say Sideous survived his fall

*Cough*

Lol umm no...darth maul died after being sliced in half and everything about the clone wars series is bologna and that's that..I think pretty much any genuine Star Wars fan with a good head on their shoulders would back me up there

Kelevra wrote:

Then why don't we say Sideous survived his fall

*Cough*

Nope. Wikis are very unreliable sources sometimes. There was never a clone of Sideous, and he died. End of story, "pretty much any genuine Star Wars fan with a good head on their shoulders would back me up there"! Also, "everything about the clone wars series is bologna and that's that."

Nope. Wikis are very unreliable sources sometimes. There was never a clone of Sideous, and he died. End of story, "pretty much any genuine Star Wars fan with a good head on their shoulders would back me up there"! Also, "everything about the clone wars series is bologna and that's that."

He survived in the comic book, Dark Empire 5: Emporer Reborn. Another officially licensed LucasArts product. Not only that, but he managed to later turn Luke Skywalker to the dark side.

What I'm hearing from you is that is somebody does not agree with you 100%, their opinion is somehow 'wrong,' and they are not actual fans. That's childish. Even more confusing is this arbitrary argument of what 'Star Wars' is, which is based entirely on personal opinion.

If I decide to say that Empire isn't Star Wars, how exactly am I wrong? Conversely, if I were to say that the spider crawling around on my wall is Star Wars, what's the problem? Furthermore, who are you to define whether it is right/wrong for me to do so?

Kelevra wrote:

Nope. Wikis are very unreliable sources sometimes. There was never a clone of Sideous, and he died. End of story, "pretty much any genuine Star Wars fan with a good head on their shoulders would back me up there"! Also, "everything about the clone wars series is bologna and that's that."

He survived in the comic book, Dark Empire 5: Emporer Reborn. Another officially licensed LucasArts product. Not only that, but he managed to later turn Luke Skywalker to the dark side.

What I'm hearing from you is that is somebody does not agree with you 100%, their opinion is somehow 'wrong,' and they are not actual fans. That's childish. Even more confusing is this arbitrary argument of what 'Star Wars' is, which is based entirely on personal opinion.

If I decide to say that Empire isn't Star Wars, how exactly am I wrong? Conversely, if I were to say that the spider crawling around on my wall is Star Wars, what's the problem? Furthermore, who are you to define whether it is right/wrong for me to do so?

Everyone is entitled to thier own opinion. I never said you were wrong in fact, i just implied you were wrong in my opinion. YOu have your opinion, and I have mine. Star Wars means to you what it means to you, and I gather that to you, Star Wars means that Lucas Arts/Films licenced it, whatever it may be. To me Star Wars is not that. Also I was stating that, from my experiences, many Star Wars fans would agree with me.

star wars to me is anything George Lucas approves of

*cough* darthmauldiedattheendofepisodeoneandtheclonewarsiswrong *cough*cough*